1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:09,572

2
00:00:09,572 --> 00:00:12,030
Rob Bowden Hi sum Rob Bowden,
et fama quiz0.

3
00:00:12,030 --> 00:00:13,280

4
00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:14,545
>> Et primo quaeritur.

5
00:00:14,545 --> 00:00:17,750
Quaestio haec est, in qua
tu opus ad Codicis numerus

6
00:00:17,750 --> 00:00:21,270
CXXVII bulbs in binariae.

7
00:00:21,270 --> 00:00:23,550
Si volui, vos could
facere regularis conversionem

8
00:00:23,550 --> 00:00:25,950
vel ex bi--, a decimales ad binariae.

9
00:00:25,950 --> 00:00:28,300
Sed quod suus 'forsit iens
multum temporis acciperet.

10
00:00:28,300 --> 00:00:31,750
Dico vobis, quod instar sicco,
OK, quod est I, II, in eo,

11
00:00:31,750 --> 00:00:33,650
Et in IV, non in VIII.

12
00:00:33,650 --> 00:00:39,280
Facillimus via est CXXVII minus CXXVIII.

13
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,013
Leftmost est lux bulbus ut CXXVIII-bit.

14
00:00:42,013 --> 00:00:43,490

15
00:00:43,490 --> 00:00:47,860
CXXVII, est realiter omnes iustus So
of the other lux bulbi,

16
00:00:47,860 --> 00:00:51,420
quia ut 'leftmost
Rod minus I.

17
00:00:51,420 --> 00:00:52,800
Id est quod est.

18
00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:54,060
>> Quaest.

19
00:00:54,060 --> 00:00:56,710
Et cum III bits et vos potest
VIII repraesentant valores distinct.

20
00:00:56,710 --> 00:01:01,000
Cur igitur non sit negativa maxima VII
decimales integer potes repraesentant?

21
00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:04,050
Bene, si nos non potest contingere
VIII distinct repraesentant valores,

22
00:01:04,050 --> 00:01:07,430
et tunc erant 'iens ut quod
is repraesentat 0, per VII.

23
00:01:07,430 --> 00:01:08,745
0 ducit, ex valores.

24
00:01:08,745 --> 00:01:09,980

25
00:01:09,980 --> 00:01:11,190
>> Primo, utrum duo.

26
00:01:11,190 --> 00:01:14,610
Cum n bits, quot distinct
Vos namque valores?

27
00:01:14,610 --> 00:01:19,080
Sic n frena habes II
bit valores pro singulis.

28
00:01:19,080 --> 00:01:22,300
Sic habemus pro II valores
primum paulum II valores

29
00:01:22,300 --> 00:01:24,450
nam secunda, II
potest enim tertia.

30
00:01:24,450 --> 00:01:28,730
II II tempora temporibus id et II, et
Ad ultimum respondetur, II, n.

31
00:01:28,730 --> 00:01:30,010

32
00:01:30,010 --> 00:01:31,100
>> Trium quaest.

33
00:01:31,100 --> 00:01:33,450
Quid 0x50 in binariae?

34
00:01:33,450 --> 00:01:39,490
Scito ergo quod hexadecimal est valde
versutius conversionem ad binariae.

35
00:01:39,490 --> 00:01:43,180
Ita hic iustus quaeret
in praeter 0 et V.

36
00:01:43,180 --> 00:01:45,110
Sic illud quod suus 'V in binariae?

37
00:01:45,110 --> 00:01:48,400
CI, et quod suus 'a I IV aliquantulus frenum.

38
00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:49,900
Quid suus '0 in binariae?

39
00:01:49,900 --> 00:01:50,520
Non furta.

40
00:01:50,520 --> 00:01:52,180
0000.

41
00:01:52,180 --> 00:01:54,970
Et posuit eos, et
ut 'numerus in binariae.

42
00:01:54,970 --> 00:01:57,640
(MX).

43
00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,439
Et si tu ipse id possis
tolle quod leftmost zero.

44
00:02:00,439 --> 00:02:01,105
Suus 'impertinens.

45
00:02:01,105 --> 00:02:02,920

46
00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:05,733
>> Ergo quadratum pentagono,
quod 0x50 in decimales?

47
00:02:05,733 --> 00:02:08,649
Si vos volo, si tu es could--
magis comfortable cum binarii,

48
00:02:08,649 --> 00:02:11,340
tu respondere, quod si binarii
et quod in decimales convertendi.

49
00:02:11,340 --> 00:02:13,870
Vel potest iustus memor,
quod hexadecimal.

50
00:02:13,870 --> 00:02:21,140
Ti 0 0 ut in loco,
V et in primis ad XVI.

51
00:02:21,140 --> 00:02:25,990
Ita hic habemus ad V temporibus XVI
Primo quidem, 0, temporibus XVI plus ad zero,

52
00:02:25,990 --> 00:02:27,520
LXXX est.

53
00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:29,710
Et si aspexi
title in quaestione,

54
00:02:29,710 --> 00:02:32,920
CS erat LXXX, a quo de illa
Ad hoc respondetur ad quaestionem indicat.

55
00:02:32,920 --> 00:02:34,460

56
00:02:34,460 --> 00:02:35,420
>> Primo, utrum quinque.

57
00:02:35,420 --> 00:02:40,320
Habentes autem cuiusquam script, quae est
repetita IV times jelly Peanut butyrum.

58
00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:42,800
Quid est ergo, quod iam in codice C?

59
00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:47,730
Bene, in audere habet a parte here--
non est una pars ad peragendam.

60
00:02:47,730 --> 00:02:51,950
Sic habemus IV loop quod suus 'a looping IV
times, eros butyrum elementum-ing printf,

61
00:02:51,950 --> 00:02:53,910
res novas quaerit aciem.

62
00:02:53,910 --> 00:02:55,250

63
00:02:55,250 --> 00:02:57,490
>> Sex q, alius cuiusquam rei.

64
00:02:57,490 --> 00:03:00,210
Nos videmus in aeternum loop.

65
00:03:00,210 --> 00:03:05,000
Et nos erant 'dicens variabilis
deinde incrementing I i per.

66
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:09,580
Sunt autem quod nolo illud facio, quod in C.
potuisset enim multipliciter.

67
00:03:09,580 --> 00:03:12,840
Hoc autem factum est ad Codicis
ut a dum loop in aeternum (verum est).

68
00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,600
Sic dicimus variabilis, sicut
sicut et nos erant autem cuiusquam in variabilis i.

69
00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:21,950
Annuntiate variabilis, et in aeternum
Dum (verus), dicendum est variabilis.

70
00:03:21,950 --> 00:03:25,260
Sic printf% i--% d, aut tu Ive 'solebat.

71
00:03:25,260 --> 00:03:27,985
Ad quod dicendum est, quod varia, et
tunc ADCRETIO eam, ++ i.

72
00:03:27,985 --> 00:03:29,560

73
00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:30,830
>> Quaestio VII.

74
00:03:30,830 --> 00:03:35,560
Nunc volumus facere aliquid simile
ut Mario dot c de problemate unum.

75
00:03:35,560 --> 00:03:39,110
Haec nos volo ut procer hashtags,
nos volo ut procer a quinque

76
00:03:39,110 --> 00:03:40,700
by rectangulum per tres hashes eorum.

77
00:03:40,700 --> 00:03:41,770

78
00:03:41,770 --> 00:03:43,162
Quomodo ergo possum hoc facere?

79
00:03:43,162 --> 00:03:45,370
Sane, tota tibi
fasciculum codice, et te

80
00:03:45,370 --> 00:03:47,560
in the print eget munus explere.

81
00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:49,540
>> Ideo quod PrintGrid vultus amo?

82
00:03:49,540 --> 00:03:51,480
Bene praeteritum in te
latitudinem et altitudinem.

83
00:03:51,480 --> 00:03:53,520
Nos scimus quoniam translati sint, exterior IV
loop, ut 'looping

84
00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:57,650
hoc super omnes ordines
nos volo ut procer sicco ut velit.

85
00:03:57,650 --> 00:04:01,250
Tunc nos sumus in IV loop habitant inter-,
ut 'printing in qualibet columna sunt.

86
00:04:01,250 --> 00:04:06,210
Et epistylia, et nos procer
utrumque agmen unum cinis.

87
00:04:06,210 --> 00:04:10,045
Et nos procer ordine ad finem
una ad novam lineam proximo versu.

88
00:04:10,045 --> 00:04:11,420
Quod ut per totum velit.

89
00:04:11,420 --> 00:04:12,810

90
00:04:12,810 --> 00:04:13,675
>> Primo, in octo.

91
00:04:13,675 --> 00:04:17,170
A functio sicut dicitur PrintGrid
habere latus effectum, non reditus

92
00:04:17,170 --> 00:04:17,670
valor.

93
00:04:17,670 --> 00:04:19,209
Quicquid sit distinctio.

94
00:04:19,209 --> 00:04:23,080
Et hoc vobis innititur memor
quid a parte effectus.

95
00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,180
Bene, a reditus value--
scimus non PrintGrid

96
00:04:25,180 --> 00:04:28,180
reditum in pretio habeant, cum
quod rectum est hic, dicit vacuum.

97
00:04:28,180 --> 00:04:31,150
Et aliquid quod irritum reddit
at non inputs.

98
00:04:31,150 --> 00:04:32,200

99
00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:33,620
Sic illud quod est effectus?

100
00:04:33,620 --> 00:04:36,620
Sed a parte effectus,
quae perstat aliquo genere

101
00:04:36,620 --> 00:04:39,500
ad munus summum
quod non esset iustus, reversi sunt,

102
00:04:39,500 --> 00:04:41,340
et non solum secundum quod clamo.

103
00:04:41,340 --> 00:04:44,970
>> Ut, verbi gratia, ut nos
mutare a global variabilis.

104
00:04:44,970 --> 00:04:46,590
Quod effectus sit.

105
00:04:46,590 --> 00:04:49,000
In hoc casu, et
Magna ex parte effectus,

106
00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:51,070
quae excudendi, ad screen.

107
00:04:51,070 --> 00:04:53,110
Tale quoque est latus effectum
quod PrintGrid habet.

108
00:04:53,110 --> 00:04:54,980
Nos haec figuras elit.

109
00:04:54,980 --> 00:04:56,370
Et vos potest cogitare de
quod a parte effectus,

110
00:04:56,370 --> 00:04:58,690
quia id quod est aliquid,
persistat post hoc autem desinit.

111
00:04:58,690 --> 00:05:01,481
Ut 'aliquid praeter
of hoc munus quod ultimate

112
00:05:01,481 --> 00:05:03,380
illud quod mutatur, sit
quae in screen.

113
00:05:03,380 --> 00:05:05,200

114
00:05:05,200 --> 00:05:05,839
>> Quaestio IX.

115
00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:07,880
Vide infra in progressio,
ut lineae, quae numero

116
00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:09,740
quae additae sunt pro
causa non agitur.

117
00:05:09,740 --> 00:05:13,480
Sic sunt ponimus
vocat GetString condatur,

118
00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:16,220
in hanc variabilem s et
quae excudendi, variable s.

119
00:05:16,220 --> 00:05:16,720
OK.

120
00:05:16,720 --> 00:05:19,090
Cur igitur unum secundum lineam.

121
00:05:19,090 --> 00:05:20,920
# include cs50 dot h.

122
00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:23,820
Ut quid et nos postulo # include cs50 dot h?

123
00:05:23,820 --> 00:05:26,180
Quid erant 'vocans
GetString functio,

124
00:05:26,180 --> 00:05:28,840
GetString Et dicitur
in CS50 library.

125
00:05:28,840 --> 00:05:31,600
Et si nos non habere
# include cs50 dot h,

126
00:05:31,600 --> 00:05:35,760
ut daret nobis implicita declarationis
functio GetString est error

127
00:05:35,760 --> 00:05:36,840
a compilator.

128
00:05:36,840 --> 00:05:40,110
Et ideo oportet quod addatur library--
nobis necesse ut comprehendo file caput capitis,

129
00:05:40,110 --> 00:05:42,870
Quia si non, non hoc adiecta sunt
Agnoscere quod GetString est.

130
00:05:42,870 --> 00:05:44,380

131
00:05:44,380 --> 00:05:46,140
>> Quare duae lineae sunt.

132
00:05:46,140 --> 00:05:47,890
Sic vexillum IO dot h.

133
00:05:47,890 --> 00:05:50,430
Suus 'exigo idem eadem idem
ut in problemate praecedente,

134
00:05:50,430 --> 00:05:53,310
nisi instead of paciscor
GetString, erant 'sermo super printf.

135
00:05:53,310 --> 00:05:56,654
Unde oportet dicere, si non
ut includunt vexillum IO dot h,

136
00:05:56,654 --> 00:05:58,820
sic non haberet virtutem movendi
uti functio printf,

137
00:05:58,820 --> 00:06:00,653
quia compilator
non esset intelligibile.

138
00:06:00,653 --> 00:06:01,750

139
00:06:01,750 --> 00:06:05,260
>> Quid sibi vult ista Why--
in line of quattuor irritum?

140
00:06:05,260 --> 00:06:08,010
Ita hic habemus int main (vacuum).

141
00:06:08,010 --> 00:06:10,600
Quod suus 'iustus dicens quod
non questus ullus line

142
00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:12,280
Pelagus rationibus.

143
00:06:12,280 --> 00:06:17,390
Et nota quod posset dicere int
main int argc argv uncis nervo.

144
00:06:17,390 --> 00:06:20,400
Tantum ergo hic dicimus sine
isti contempserunt order versus argumenta.

145
00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:21,840

146
00:06:21,840 --> 00:06:25,225
>> Expone igitur secundum memoriam, sicut
quod linea, in sex GetString redit.

147
00:06:25,225 --> 00:06:27,040

148
00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:31,640
Reversus est a GetString est scandalum
memoria aciem moribus.

149
00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:34,870
Suus 'vere reversus est
Primus character monstratorem.

150
00:06:34,870 --> 00:06:37,170
Memento quoniam chorda stella chari.

151
00:06:37,170 --> 00:06:41,360
Et primum est monstratorem s
quidquid est in character nervo,

152
00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:43,510
tincidunt ut intrarent ad user.

153
00:06:43,510 --> 00:06:47,070
Et quod contingit memoria malloced,
ut memoria in cumulum.

154
00:06:47,070 --> 00:06:49,080

155
00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:50,450
>> Quaestio XIII.

156
00:06:50,450 --> 00:06:51,960
Vide infra in progressio.

157
00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:55,579
Et hoc ipsum quod est facere omnia
I divisa per X-ing est printf.

158
00:06:55,579 --> 00:06:57,370
Sic et cum compilavit
tur, is progressio

159
00:06:57,370 --> 00:07:01,170
outputs 0.0, quamvis
I divisa per X 0.1 est.

160
00:07:01,170 --> 00:07:02,970
0.0 Quid ergo?

161
00:07:02,970 --> 00:07:05,510
Bene, hoc est quia
of integer divisionem.

162
00:07:05,510 --> 00:07:08,580
I et integer, integer X.

163
00:07:08,580 --> 00:07:11,980
So I divisa per X, omnia,
sit sicut numeri integri,

164
00:07:11,980 --> 00:07:16,380
et in C, quum id integer divisionem,
si quis post punctum truncatae.

165
00:07:16,380 --> 00:07:19,590
So I divisa per X est
0, et tunc erant 'trying

166
00:07:19,590 --> 00:07:24,410
ut procer quod float a, so
nullis impensis, ut est a float 0.0.

167
00:07:24,410 --> 00:07:27,400
0.0 Et ideo efficiuntur.

168
00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:28,940
>> Vide infra in progressio.

169
00:07:28,940 --> 00:07:31,280
Nunc erant 'excudendi, 0.1.

170
00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:34,280
Nulla integer divisionem,
et nos erant 'iustus excudendi, 0.1,

171
00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:37,100
sed erant 'excudendi, illud
XXVIII ad decimal locis.

172
00:07:37,100 --> 00:07:41,810
Et nos adepto hoc 0,1000, totum fasciculum
devenitur, V V V, blah blah blah.

173
00:07:41,810 --> 00:07:45,495
Quaeritur cur hic facit
quia print, instead of 0.1 prorsus?

174
00:07:45,495 --> 00:07:46,620

175
00:07:46,620 --> 00:07:49,640
>> Et rationem assignat hic et nunc
supernatantem punctum parum.

176
00:07:49,640 --> 00:07:53,410
Memento quod a float est XXXII scissionibus.

177
00:07:53,410 --> 00:07:57,540
Nos finita potest repraesentare
ex his natantis punctum valores XXXII

178
00:07:57,540 --> 00:07:58,560
bits.

179
00:07:58,560 --> 00:08:01,760
Bene suus tandem infinite
supernatantem punctum valores multis,

180
00:08:01,760 --> 00:08:04,940
et ibi suus 'supernatantem infinitae
in punctum valores intra 0 et I,

181
00:08:04,940 --> 00:08:07,860
manifestum est quod erant '
magis quam repraesentant valores.

182
00:08:07,860 --> 00:08:13,230
Est itaque immolabant
et repraesentare potest esse maxima virtutum.

183
00:08:13,230 --> 00:08:16,960
>> Et sicut a value 0.1 videtur
visus est non omnino.

184
00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:22,500
Sic instead of 0.1 repraesentans facimus
Optimum possumus 0.100000 ipsius V V

185
00:08:22,500 --> 00:08:23,260
V.

186
00:08:23,260 --> 00:08:26,306
Et quod suus 'pulchellus exitu
et pro multus of applications

187
00:08:26,306 --> 00:08:28,430
have ut fatigo super vos
supernatantem punctum parum,

188
00:08:28,430 --> 00:08:30,930
quia non potest esse iusta
natantis puncta prorsus omnia.

189
00:08:30,930 --> 00:08:32,500

190
00:08:32,500 --> 00:08:33,380
>> QUAESTIO XV.

191
00:08:33,380 --> 00:08:34,679
Considerate code below.

192
00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:36,630
Erant 'iustus excudendi, I plus I.

193
00:08:36,630 --> 00:08:38,289
Et hic error est.

194
00:08:38,289 --> 00:08:41,780
I plus I evaluates ad II, et
tunc erant 'excudendi, hoc.

195
00:08:41,780 --> 00:08:42,789
Is iustus procer II.

196
00:08:42,789 --> 00:08:43,850

197
00:08:43,850 --> 00:08:44,700
>> QUAESTIO XVI.

198
00:08:44,700 --> 00:08:49,450
Nunc erant 'excudendi, character
I plus I est character.

199
00:08:49,450 --> 00:08:52,110
Cur ergo non haec
procer idem?

200
00:08:52,110 --> 00:08:57,680
Bene est I plus character est character
I, I, habet a character ASCII valorem XLIX.

201
00:08:57,680 --> 00:09:04,840
Et hoc plus XLIX XLIX dicens vere et
tandem hoc est iens ut procer XCVIII.

202
00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:06,130
Unde non procer II.

203
00:09:06,130 --> 00:09:08,070

204
00:09:08,070 --> 00:09:09,271
>> Quaestio XVII.

205
00:09:09,271 --> 00:09:11,520
Perficere exsecutionem
sic infra impar

206
00:09:11,520 --> 00:09:14,615
quod verum est, si functio redit,
n et n impar est falsum.

207
00:09:14,615 --> 00:09:16,710

208
00:09:16,710 --> 00:09:19,330
Hoc magnum est, consilium
ad mod operator.

209
00:09:19,330 --> 00:09:24,530
Sic argum sumimus,
mod II, si n aequales I, fons

210
00:09:24,530 --> 00:09:28,030
quod n sit quod dividi
II by reliquum fuit.

211
00:09:28,030 --> 00:09:33,270
Si n II divisa erat reliqua, id
n impar quod ita verum revertamur.

212
00:09:33,270 --> 00:09:34,910
Aut redit falsum.

213
00:09:34,910 --> 00:09:39,070
Vos etiam potuit facere, n mod II aequales
nulla, redire falsum, quia sic ipso facto ipsum.

214
00:09:39,070 --> 00:09:41,600

215
00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:43,640
>> Considerate recursive functio inferius.

216
00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:46,920
Si n fuerit minor, aut
I aequalis, redire I,

217
00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:50,430
reditus minus quam n vicibus n I of f.

218
00:09:50,430 --> 00:09:52,556
Sic illud quod est functio?

219
00:09:52,556 --> 00:09:54,305
Bene, hoc est ipsum,
factorial muneris.

220
00:09:54,305 --> 00:09:55,410

221
00:09:55,410 --> 00:09:57,405
Hoc repraesentatum est nicely
factorial ut n.

222
00:09:57,405 --> 00:09:58,720

223
00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:02,310
>> XIX Et nunc interrogare volumus
hoc recursive functio.

224
00:10:02,310 --> 00:10:04,530
Nos volo ut faceret illud iterative.

225
00:10:04,530 --> 00:10:05,874
Et quid faceret?

226
00:10:05,874 --> 00:10:07,790
Atque emollitum est baculus
locutio, et iterum illic '

227
00:10:07,790 --> 00:10:11,090
multiple vias vobis fecisse poterat
quod nos satus cum int, hoc productum

228
00:10:11,090 --> 00:10:11,812
I pares.

229
00:10:11,812 --> 00:10:13,520
Et per hoc
pro ansam veniat, et nos erant 'iens

230
00:10:13,520 --> 00:10:17,590
ut multiplicari possit in ultima uber
tandem cum plena factorial.

231
00:10:17,590 --> 00:10:21,870
Ita int i pares II, i
minus vel aequale n, ++.

232
00:10:21,870 --> 00:10:24,130
>> Vos vires exsisto admiratio cur pares II.

233
00:10:24,130 --> 00:10:28,380
Sed considerandum est quod hie
facere nostra basis casu est.

234
00:10:28,380 --> 00:10:32,180
Si n fuerit minor vel aequalis
ad I, erant 'iustus I redit.

235
00:10:32,180 --> 00:10:34,830
Sic super hic, et nos satus procul II i pares.

236
00:10:34,830 --> 00:10:39,090
Bene, si esset I i, et tunc the--
I, si n fuerit, tunc pro loop

237
00:10:39,090 --> 00:10:40,600
at quod facere non omnibus.

238
00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:43,190
Et ita esset iustus
reditum opus, quod est I.

239
00:10:43,190 --> 00:10:45,920
Similiter, si n fuerit
quod non est 1--

240
00:10:45,920 --> 00:10:49,290
Si 0, negative I, whatever--
et nos youd 'adhuc redire I,

241
00:10:49,290 --> 00:10:52,260
quod etiam de
facit recursive version.

242
00:10:52,260 --> 00:10:54,660
>> Nunc, si n
I quam tunc erant 'iens

243
00:10:54,660 --> 00:10:56,550
ut saltem unus
iteratione hoc loop.

244
00:10:56,550 --> 00:11:00,630
N V Sic lets 'dicere, tunc nos
fit quoque ut facturus sum pares II temporibus.

245
00:11:00,630 --> 00:11:02,165
Nunc opus est II.

246
00:11:02,165 --> 00:11:04,040
Nunc erant 'iens efficio
product III temporibus pares.

247
00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:04,690
Nunc suus 'VI.

248
00:11:04,690 --> 00:11:07,500
Product IV temporibus pares, nunc suus 'XXIV.

249
00:11:07,500 --> 00:11:10,420
Product V temporibus pares, nunc suus 'CXX.

250
00:11:10,420 --> 00:11:16,730
Et tandem, erant 'revertentes
CXX, qui ex te est V factorial.

251
00:11:16,730 --> 00:11:17,510
>> QUAESTIO XX.

252
00:11:17,510 --> 00:11:22,480
Hoc unum ubi explere
algorithm quacunque in hac tabula,

253
00:11:22,480 --> 00:11:25,735
quod vidimus testamur, et
haec convenit run algorithmic

254
00:11:25,735 --> 00:11:28,060
crura asymptotica run temporibus quibus times.

255
00:11:28,060 --> 00:11:33,270
Sic illud quod est an algorithm, qui
I of is omega, of magnus O n, sed?

256
00:11:33,270 --> 00:11:35,970
Et sic non potest esse in infinitum,
multis responsis here.

257
00:11:35,970 --> 00:11:39,790
Maxime probabile est quod vidi
frequenter est linearibus search.

258
00:11:39,790 --> 00:11:42,050
>> Sic in optimo casu
missionem, item erant '

259
00:11:42,050 --> 00:11:44,050
respiciam, nisi ad
incipiens a primo indicem

260
00:11:44,050 --> 00:11:47,400
I of steps in ita et omega,
Primo quidem ad reprimendum ipsum,

261
00:11:47,400 --> 00:11:49,740
statim nos iustus reverti
quod item nos invenit.

262
00:11:49,740 --> 00:11:52,189
Ad deterrima casu missionem,
item est in fine,

263
00:11:52,189 --> 00:11:53,730
item in album, aut omnino non est.

264
00:11:53,730 --> 00:11:56,700
Nos scimus quoniam translati quaerere
etiam membris corporis, de qua n omnia

265
00:11:56,700 --> 00:11:58,480
elementa, et quid suus 'O n.

266
00:11:58,480 --> 00:11:59,670

267
00:11:59,670 --> 00:12:04,880
>> Illud ergo quod est et
et omega n log n, et magnus O n log n.

268
00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:08,650
Sed hoc maxime in rem
Vidi merge modi est.

269
00:12:08,650 --> 00:12:12,950
Sic merge modi, memento,
denique de theta

270
00:12:12,950 --> 00:12:16,920
ex n log n, ubi definitur theta
si magnus O oo et similia.

271
00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:17,580
Et n log n.

272
00:12:17,580 --> 00:12:18,690

273
00:12:18,690 --> 00:12:21,970
>> Quid est aliquid ut 'omega
n, n ad O et quadrari?

274
00:12:21,970 --> 00:12:23,990
Euge, iterum illic '
multiple possibilis responsa.

275
00:12:23,990 --> 00:12:26,440
Hic nos contigerit ut bulla sort.

276
00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:28,840
Quod etiam hic insertionem modi.

277
00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:31,400
Memento quod bulla sort
Ubi habet quod optimization,

278
00:12:31,400 --> 00:12:34,630
Si vos es validus impetro
per omnem list

279
00:12:34,630 --> 00:12:37,402
non indiget, ut faciat
aliud swaps igitur bene

280
00:12:37,402 --> 00:12:40,110
statim nos recurrunt,
incipere sorted list.

281
00:12:40,110 --> 00:12:43,185
Sic optimus casu missionem,
omega suus n.

282
00:12:43,185 --> 00:12:45,960
Si id non est nicely
sorted list incipit,

283
00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:48,270
O quantum ad hoc, de qua n quadrantur swaps.

284
00:12:48,270 --> 00:12:49,330

285
00:12:49,330 --> 00:12:55,610
Denique talis lectio nobis
nam n quadrangulum et omega, et magnus O.

286
00:12:55,610 --> 00:12:56,850
>> Quaestio XXI.

287
00:12:56,850 --> 00:12:58,870
Quid est integer redundabunt?

288
00:12:58,870 --> 00:13:02,160
Bene etiam superiorum simile,
eo tantum finitis bits

289
00:13:02,160 --> 00:13:04,255
ad repraesentandum an integer,
XXXII bits maybe ita.

290
00:13:04,255 --> 00:13:06,300

291
00:13:06,300 --> 00:13:09,180
Dic legem habemus integer.

292
00:13:09,180 --> 00:13:12,800
Et tandem ad summum
numerum integrum positivum potest repraesentare

293
00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:15,910
XXXI I ad II est minus.

294
00:13:15,910 --> 00:13:19,370
Et quid si non valeamus,
tunc ADCRETIO ut integer?

295
00:13:19,370 --> 00:13:25,320
Bene, nos erant 'iens ire ad XXXI II
minus I, negative II omni via usque ad

296
00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:26,490
ad XXXI.

297
00:13:26,490 --> 00:13:29,470
Et hoc est integer redundabunt
incrementing erit tibi cum servaveris,

298
00:13:29,470 --> 00:13:32,330
et tandem non,
et is iustus adepto superior

299
00:13:32,330 --> 00:13:34,520
involvit omnia quae retro
circa ad valorem negativum.

300
00:13:34,520 --> 00:13:35,850

301
00:13:35,850 --> 00:13:37,779
>> Quid a quiddam redundabunt?

302
00:13:37,779 --> 00:13:39,820
Et a quiddam overflow--
a quiddam memoria est quod est.

303
00:13:39,820 --> 00:13:41,000
Suus 'iustus a FRUSTUM memoriae.

304
00:13:41,000 --> 00:13:43,350
Simile quiddam est ordinata.

305
00:13:43,350 --> 00:13:46,120
Et cum sit quiddam redundabunt
vos tendo ut obvius memoria,

306
00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:47,880
Finis autem supra ordinata.

307
00:13:47,880 --> 00:13:50,410
Sic si vos habere,
et array molis V

308
00:13:50,410 --> 00:13:53,700
conantur obvius array bracket
V aut VI aut bracket bracket VII,

309
00:13:53,700 --> 00:13:56,610
nec aliquid extra
finem suum vel etiam aliquid

310
00:13:56,610 --> 00:14:00,790
below-- array bracket negative 1--
omnes de his, quae buffer redundat.

311
00:14:00,790 --> 00:14:02,810
Vestri 'tangens memoria in malis modis.

312
00:14:02,810 --> 00:14:04,090

313
00:14:04,090 --> 00:14:04,730
>> Quaestio XXIII.

314
00:14:04,730 --> 00:14:05,760

315
00:14:05,760 --> 00:14:09,100
Sic in hoc unum opus
ad peragendam strlen.

316
00:14:09,100 --> 00:14:11,630
Et dicunt quia non potest
s ponatur, non erit nulla,

317
00:14:11,630 --> 00:14:13,790
ita et vos non habent
reprehendo pro null fecerit.

318
00:14:13,790 --> 00:14:16,190
Et plures modi,
tu enim fecisti.

319
00:14:16,190 --> 00:14:18,440
Hoc facite in voluntate.

320
00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:21,780
Lorem contraria, n. n est,
numerat quot ingenia sunt.

321
00:14:21,780 --> 00:14:25,560
Sic incipit ad 0, et tunc
RESUMO super totum list.

322
00:14:25,560 --> 00:14:29,092
>> Is s bracket 0 æqualis
character null Termino?

323
00:14:29,092 --> 00:14:31,425
Memento, quaerere
null character est terminator

324
00:14:31,425 --> 00:14:33,360
ut statuant, quamvis diuturna nostra chorda est.

325
00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:35,890
Quod est iens terminare
relevant quis filum.

326
00:14:35,890 --> 00:14:39,400
Sic s bracket 0 æqualis
ad null Termino?

327
00:14:39,400 --> 00:14:42,850
Si non, tunc erant 'iens ut
intueri s bracket I, s bracket II.

328
00:14:42,850 --> 00:14:45,050
Ut custodiant iens donec
invenire null Termino.

329
00:14:45,050 --> 00:14:48,580
Semel inveneris continet n
tota fili,

330
00:14:48,580 --> 00:14:49,942
possumus et revertere.

331
00:14:49,942 --> 00:14:51,180

332
00:14:51,180 --> 00:14:51,865
>> Quaestio XXIV.

333
00:14:51,865 --> 00:14:53,010

334
00:14:53,010 --> 00:14:56,050
Hoc est ergo in quo non
habent facere mercaturam off.

335
00:14:56,050 --> 00:14:59,810
Itaque unum bonum est in
modo, sed malum est, quo modo?

336
00:14:59,810 --> 00:15:02,980
Sic hic, merge modi tendit
borrire modi velocius erit.

337
00:15:02,980 --> 00:15:06,530
Cum dixit that-- bene,
sunt multiple responsis here.

338
00:15:06,530 --> 00:15:12,930
Sed maximum est, quod talis bulla
Omega est enim a sorted album of n.

339
00:15:12,930 --> 00:15:14,950
>> Memento illam enim sicut ex inducta.

340
00:15:14,950 --> 00:15:17,600
Sic bulla generis est Omega
n, in optimo casu missione

341
00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:20,010
procedam quiverit est
numero simul, determinare

342
00:15:20,010 --> 00:15:22,270
heus hoc est rei iam
sorted, et reditus processit.

343
00:15:22,270 --> 00:15:25,960
Merge generis, cuiusvis
vos facitis, ex n log n est omega.

344
00:15:25,960 --> 00:15:29,200
Sic enim sorted album, borrire
velocior enim futurum.

345
00:15:29,200 --> 00:15:30,870

346
00:15:30,870 --> 00:15:32,430
>> Sed quid de connexionem lists?

347
00:15:32,430 --> 00:15:36,070
A cohærentes album, et ideo potest aliquod subterfugi
ut fit in multis necessarius.

348
00:15:36,070 --> 00:15:38,489
Effatus est ita that--
solet in directo comparatio

349
00:15:38,489 --> 00:15:40,280
est iens futurus a cohærentes
list with an ordinata.

350
00:15:40,280 --> 00:15:41,600

351
00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:44,050
Potest igitur et si vestit
nolumus de facili

352
00:15:44,050 --> 00:15:47,130
ut fit in multis
quatenus opus fuerit, a cohærentes album

353
00:15:47,130 --> 00:15:49,600
comparari potest an array--
array habet temere accessum.

354
00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:52,960
Possumus index in aliquam
particulare elementum, in aciem.

355
00:15:52,960 --> 00:15:56,430
>> Ergo connexionem list possumus
abi elementum quintum,

356
00:15:56,430 --> 00:16:00,260
ab initio habemus percurrere
donec veniamus ad quintum elementum.

357
00:16:00,260 --> 00:16:03,990
Et ne secundum quod suus 'iens
eo quod est facere simile binariae search.

358
00:16:03,990 --> 00:16:08,150
De binariae search, binariae search
quaestionis velocius tendit.

359
00:16:08,150 --> 00:16:11,120
Cum dixit that--
ita unum fieri potest, res

360
00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:13,380
quod non potest binarium
quaero in cohærentes lists,

361
00:16:13,380 --> 00:16:14,730
tantummodo in te vestit.

362
00:16:14,730 --> 00:16:18,030
Sed probabile est, quod maius est,
vos non potestis facere binariae search

363
00:16:18,030 --> 00:16:20,690
in an array quod non est digestus.

364
00:16:20,690 --> 00:16:23,990
Upfront vos vires postulo exstat
in aciem, et tunc

365
00:16:23,990 --> 00:16:25,370
quid binariae search.

366
00:16:25,370 --> 00:16:27,660
Et si aliquid non est
sorted iam primum,

367
00:16:27,660 --> 00:16:29,250
tunc velocior erit ut linearibus search.

368
00:16:29,250 --> 00:16:30,620

369
00:16:30,620 --> 00:16:31,740
>> Quaestio XXVII.

370
00:16:31,740 --> 00:16:34,770
Sic attendite quomodo infra in progressio,
quae in proxime dictum.

371
00:16:34,770 --> 00:16:37,790
Et hoc est, ubi sumus
iens ut volo ut expresse statuit,

372
00:16:37,790 --> 00:16:39,980
pro diversis variabilium valores.

373
00:16:39,980 --> 00:16:41,990
Intueamur ergo quam.

374
00:16:41,990 --> 00:16:43,160
>> Linea itaque unam.

375
00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:45,457
I habemus int x pares.

376
00:16:45,457 --> 00:16:47,040
Hic nihil est quod accidit.

377
00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:50,440
Itaque una linea, videmus in
mensam y, a, b, et omnes tmp

378
00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:51,540
opacatur in illo.

379
00:16:51,540 --> 00:16:52,280
Quid ergo est, x?

380
00:16:52,280 --> 00:16:53,860
Sicut dicimus eum esse bene I.

381
00:16:53,860 --> 00:16:55,020

382
00:16:55,020 --> 00:16:58,770
Et tunc duo lineae, etiam
Ponatur y II videmus,

383
00:16:58,770 --> 00:17:00,550
et mensam, iam
implebitur in nobis.

384
00:17:00,550 --> 00:17:03,040
I et II x et y.

385
00:17:03,040 --> 00:17:05,890
>> Nunc, triplici instructa acie, erant 'nunc
inside PERMUTO functio.

386
00:17:05,890 --> 00:17:07,560
Quid enim transimus ad VERTO?

387
00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:11,609
Nos tulit ad x ampersand
a, y, et ampersand ad b.

388
00:17:11,609 --> 00:17:15,160
Ubi forsit maturius
dictum sit, quod oratio x

389
00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:17,520
0x10 est, et verba 0x14 est y.

390
00:17:17,520 --> 00:17:18,970

391
00:17:18,970 --> 00:17:21,909
Sic erit et b
Et 0x10 0x14, respective.

392
00:17:21,909 --> 00:17:23,670

393
00:17:23,670 --> 00:17:26,250
>> Linea autem tres, x et y, quid?

394
00:17:26,250 --> 00:17:28,554
Bene, nihil mutatum
de hoc loco x et y.

395
00:17:28,554 --> 00:17:30,470
Etiam si ipsi erant '
inside a main ACERVUS artus,

396
00:17:30,470 --> 00:17:32,469
adhuc habent idem eadem idem
values ​​ante consueverant.

397
00:17:32,469 --> 00:17:34,030
Sed neque mutatio aliqua memoria.

398
00:17:34,030 --> 00:17:35,710
Sic I x, y II.

399
00:17:35,710 --> 00:17:36,550

400
00:17:36,550 --> 00:17:37,050
All right.

401
00:17:37,050 --> 00:17:40,300
Hoc autem dixit ad astrum a int tmp aequales.

402
00:17:40,300 --> 00:17:44,410
So at line quatuor, omne
nisi idem tmp.

403
00:17:44,410 --> 00:17:47,130
Quia non mutatur, nee values
aliquid pro tmp.

404
00:17:47,130 --> 00:17:49,230
Proficiscimur ad stella tmp aequalis a.

405
00:17:49,230 --> 00:17:50,620
What is a sidus?

406
00:17:50,620 --> 00:17:56,240
Bene puncta X, et stella a
x aequalis sit futurum, quod est I.

407
00:17:56,240 --> 00:18:00,080
Ergo hoc in libro octoginta trium
ibi, et I tmp est paro.

408
00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:01,110
>> Et alia linea.

409
00:18:01,110 --> 00:18:03,380
Stella a stella aequales b.

410
00:18:03,380 --> 00:18:10,000
Unde bene per line five-- iterum, omne
nisi quod est a stella.

411
00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:10,830
What is a sidus?

412
00:18:10,830 --> 00:18:13,720
Sed, sicut dictum est in stella est x.

413
00:18:13,720 --> 00:18:16,400
Sic erant 'mutata x aequalis est stella b.

414
00:18:16,400 --> 00:18:18,960
Quid est stella b? y. ut y puncta b.

415
00:18:18,960 --> 00:18:21,030
Stella y et b est.

416
00:18:21,030 --> 00:18:25,140
Sic erant 'ponendo x = y,
idem est et cetera.

417
00:18:25,140 --> 00:18:29,130
Unde videmus in proximo versu iam x
II, sicut et ceteri imitati sunt.

418
00:18:29,130 --> 00:18:31,120
>> Quod in altera linea, stella b tmp pares.

419
00:18:31,120 --> 00:18:34,740
Bene, quod, sicut dictum est stella b y,
Lorem ita statuendo y aequalem tmp.

420
00:18:34,740 --> 00:18:37,450
Omne autem aliud est idem,
sic res quaelibet in fundo sudatio, descendit.

421
00:18:37,450 --> 00:18:42,050
Sumus constituens y aequalis tmp, quod est
unum et idem de reliquis.

422
00:18:42,050 --> 00:18:43,210
>> Iam tandem lineam septem.

423
00:18:43,210 --> 00:18:44,700
Regressi sumus in pelagus muneris.

424
00:18:44,700 --> 00:18:46,350
Sumus cum PERMUTO est.

425
00:18:46,350 --> 00:18:48,972
Amisimus a, b,
tmp, sed ad extremum conquirimus

426
00:18:48,972 --> 00:18:51,180
quis non mutari values
de quocumque est hoc,

427
00:18:51,180 --> 00:18:52,800
nos iustus effingo x et y down.

428
00:18:52,800 --> 00:18:56,490
X et y, et videmus quia
I et II I et II pro nunc.

429
00:18:56,490 --> 00:18:58,160
The PERMUTO est bene faciat.

430
00:18:58,160 --> 00:18:59,500

431
00:18:59,500 --> 00:19:00,105
>> Quaestio XXVIII.

432
00:19:00,105 --> 00:19:01,226

433
00:19:01,226 --> 00:19:03,100
Item esto, quod occurrit,
error perferentes

434
00:19:03,100 --> 00:19:06,790
in officium horas, infra
Proximo anno, ut a CA sive TF.

435
00:19:06,790 --> 00:19:08,930
Utrumque consilium quam pango erroribus.

436
00:19:08,930 --> 00:19:11,160
Sic definitam tendat ad GetString.

437
00:19:11,160 --> 00:19:12,540
Quid fieret, aspicis haec?

438
00:19:12,540 --> 00:19:15,380
Etiam sit amet si erit
GetString in eorum code,

439
00:19:15,380 --> 00:19:20,310
quod proprie cinis sub cs50
h dot ut comprehendo CS50 library.

440
00:19:20,310 --> 00:19:22,380
>> Bene, quid faciunt
postulo pango hoc error?

441
00:19:22,380 --> 00:19:26,810
They opus in quadam lcs50
quando erant 'componendis to order versus.

442
00:19:26,810 --> 00:19:29,501
Et ideo, si non est timor Dei
tubae confringe lcs50, erant '

443
00:19:29,501 --> 00:19:32,000
non habere in actu
codice quod effectum adducit quam GetString.

444
00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:33,190

445
00:19:33,190 --> 00:19:34,170
>> Quaestio XXIX.

446
00:19:34,170 --> 00:19:36,190
Implicite narrantes
library functio strlen.

447
00:19:36,190 --> 00:19:37,550

448
00:19:37,550 --> 00:19:40,360
Sed hoc, quia non
factum proprium cinis includunt.

449
00:19:40,360 --> 00:19:41,440

450
00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:45,410
In hoc casu autem caput file
non indigetis ut includunt quod linea punctus h,

451
00:19:45,410 --> 00:19:48,710
etiam h string et dot, nunc
Nunc autem student-- compilator

452
00:19:48,710 --> 00:19:51,750
accessus ad
declarationum de strlen,

453
00:19:51,750 --> 00:19:54,120
et sic cognoscit ut vestri codice
strlen recte utitur.

454
00:19:54,120 --> 00:19:55,380

455
00:19:55,380 --> 00:19:56,580
>> Quaestio XXX.

456
00:19:56,580 --> 00:20:00,240
More percent conversions
quam data ratione.

457
00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:01,540
Quid est hoc?

458
00:20:01,540 --> 00:20:06,470
Bene, illa percent
signs-- quam ipsi erant 'relevant ad printf.

459
00:20:06,470 --> 00:20:08,890
Sic printf, ut in percent--
ut procer aliquid

460
00:20:08,890 --> 00:20:11,380
i sentio amo backslash n.

461
00:20:11,380 --> 00:20:15,310
Vel sicut percent procer i,
tractus, sentio i, ex spatio, in I percent.

462
00:20:15,310 --> 00:20:18,950
Nam cuivis ex illis So
percent signa, sed oportet

463
00:20:18,950 --> 00:20:21,560
in fine autem variabili printf.

464
00:20:21,560 --> 00:20:26,980
>> Si dixerimus quoniam printf paren percent
i backslash n close paren,

465
00:20:26,980 --> 00:20:30,270
bene dicimus nos
iens ut procer an integer,

466
00:20:30,270 --> 00:20:33,970
sed non accidit printf
ut vere procer an integer.

467
00:20:33,970 --> 00:20:37,182
Et quidem hic, percent
conversions data est haec dicimus?

468
00:20:37,182 --> 00:20:39,390
Ut 'ut scribis,
totum Fasciculumque of percents,

469
00:20:39,390 --> 00:20:42,445
et non tantum variabiles
ut etiam illi in percents implere.

470
00:20:42,445 --> 00:20:44,850

471
00:20:44,850 --> 00:20:50,010
>> Et certe tunc, agitur enim XXXI,
certus amisit XL bytes in uno caudices.

472
00:20:50,010 --> 00:20:52,350
Sic Valgrind est error.

473
00:20:52,350 --> 00:20:54,720
Hic est sermo,
alicubi in vestri code,

474
00:20:54,720 --> 00:20:59,010
vos have an id est XL destinatio
tam magna es malloced bytes XL bytes,

475
00:20:59,010 --> 00:21:00,515
et cum non sit liberatus.

476
00:21:00,515 --> 00:21:02,480

477
00:21:02,480 --> 00:21:05,140
Plurimus amo vos postulo iustus
ad inveniendum aliquod memoriam, Leak,

478
00:21:05,140 --> 00:21:07,650
et in qua vos postulo ut reperio
libera hoc obstructionum of memoria.

479
00:21:07,650 --> 00:21:08,780

480
00:21:08,780 --> 00:21:11,910
>> XXXII Et conquirere,
nullum scribere molis IV.

481
00:21:11,910 --> 00:21:13,250
Porro iste est error a Valgrind.

482
00:21:13,250 --> 00:21:15,440
Hoc tamen non faciunt
cum iam memoria diffluat.

483
00:21:15,440 --> 00:21:20,750
Haec est, inquam, maxime likely--, suus '
nullum ius aliquod habet memoriam.

484
00:21:20,750 --> 00:21:23,270
Et hoc est maxime verisimile aliquid
quaedam quiddam redundabunt.

485
00:21:23,270 --> 00:21:26,560
Aciem Ubi forte
integer aciem melius

486
00:21:26,560 --> 00:21:30,115
est molis V dicimus, et
V array bracket tangere quaerunt tollere.

487
00:21:30,115 --> 00:21:34,150
Quod si velis scribere
pretium, quod memoria non est pars

488
00:21:34,150 --> 00:21:37,440
vos vere accessum habent, et
ita et vos erant 'iens impetro hic error,

489
00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:39,272
dicens scribe irritum molis IV.

490
00:21:39,272 --> 00:21:42,480
Valgrind est iens ut cognoscant te
quærebat eum tangere memoria reuocant.

491
00:21:42,480 --> 00:21:43,980
>> Quod ut 'eam propter quiz0.

492
00:21:43,980 --> 00:21:47,065
Im Rob Bowden, et hoc est CS50.

493
00:21:47,065 --> 00:21:51,104